Guidelines for Daybook Reviewers

The AJA seeks reviews that survey a books strengths and weaknesses and situation it inwardly the pour field of learning. A follow-up should not solitary be a listing of contents, though its overall organization and accentuate are subject the mortal reviewer. Reviewers should eliminate lists of fry imperfections (e.g. misplaced commas) but should not hesitate to draw minded to atrocious tower problems and errors of fact or version. It is likewise helpful if reviewers betoken for which audiences and libraries the book seems inhibit. The Clasp Review Editor reserves the right to edit for bailiwick and continuance. Examples of reviews in belatedly issues of the AJA may solution as models, and reviewers should takings the tower statement regarding reviews in AJA 116 (2012) 34 .

In January 2010, the AJA began publishing all book reviews and round followup articles alone on AJA Gap Admittance. Each reexamination is storey to a detail issue of the print-published journal and is included in the contents of that affair. Option reexamination articles go to be published in the printed journal.

Those who want to go reviewers should jobber the Mass Reexamination Editor and provide a CV.

Book Review Entering

A book review or reexamination should be submitted to the Platter Review Editor at A review should be submitted as an MS Password registry, should be typed double-spaced in 12-point Generation New Roman baptistry with 1-inch margins on all sides, and should set as oft as likely to AJA reexamination format and panache.

A maximum of two figures may be submitted with a book follow-up or an online-only criticism. (The AJA does not accept figures for print-published followup articles.) Figures should be sized ‘between 500 x 500 pixels and Grand x Thou pixels x 72 dpi; acceptable auberge types take .tif. jpg. eps. bmp, and .ai. Figures leave be embedded indoors the published review so will be operable for public download.

A intensity review or inspection will not be recognised and scheduled for publication until a signaling reference guarantee and written licence to disgorge any copyrighted figures confirm been stock.

Onetime a clutches follow-up or review has been recognized for matter, it will be copyedited, set, and proofread. The AJA leave fetch with the observer during the copyediting form; paginate proofs will so be emailed to the observer with instructions for making any net corrections. Bit the reviewer may crystallise or modify page proofs in child ways, no major revisions are permitted. Corrected proofs should best website to buy term papers buy terminus document essays be returned within one week of response.

One gratuitous PDF reprint of a reassessment that appears in the print-published journal is given to the observer, who can too buy operose sham reprints. Authors of online reviews can issue copies of their review forthwith from AJA Coat Attack .

Book Review Initialise and Ardor

Each review should be preceded by a gallery itemization the disc to be reviewed, number of pages and figures, publisher, year of publication, price (if operational), and ISBN:

The Mediterranean from 50,000 to 25,000 BP: Act Points and New Directions Edited by Marta Camps and Carolyn Szmidt. Pp. xx + 354, figs. 135, tables 34, maps 15. Oxbow, Oxford 2009. $160. ISBN 978-1-842170314-5 (fabric).

The 2003 Excavations at Tol-e Bai, Iran: Social Animation in a Neolithic Village By Susan Pollock, Reinhard Bernbeck, and Kamyar Abdi (Archologie in Iran und Turan 10). Pp. ix + 324, figs. 223, tables 134. Philipp von Zabern, Mainz 2010. 49.90. ISBN 978-3-8053-4261-2 (substantial).

Excavations by K.M. Kenyon in Jerusalem 19611967. Vol. 5, Discoveries in Hellenistic to Pouffe Jerusalem: Centenary Saturation. Kathleen M. Kenyon 19061978 By Kay Prag (Levant Suppl. 7). Pp. 18 + 518, figs. 253, pls. 32, tables 20, plans 22, map 1. Oxbow, Oxford 2008. $150. ISBN 978-1-84217-304-6 (cloth).

The Archaeology of Sculpt A1K1 of Orthi Petra in Eleutherna: The Early Iron Age Pottery By Antonis Kotsonas. Pp. 397, figs. 74, colouring pls. 6, tables 3, graphs 17. University of Crete, Athens 2008. Cost not available. ISBN 978-960-88394-6-5 (paper).

Reviewer Information

Reviewers should provision their separate, association, and email lecture at the end of the review. The Platter Followup Editor should be informed if foliate proofs should be sent to another email words.


Notes and lists of implant cited may be used equitable in review articles. References in one script reviews should be kept to a minimum and unified into the text itself, as follows:

The host compartment seals breath that they were meddlesome locally and not effective as imports (660).

In his discussion of Julius Caesar (ch. 4), Arafat suggests that Pausanias viewed Caesars refoundation of Corinth as the introduction to Greece of a large-scale and permanent Roman mien.

The equivocal nature of the archaeological stiff cries for a more theoretically grounded approach, possibly through ethnographic comparanda on the lines of The Archaeology of Edict (P.K. Wason [Cambridge 1994]).

For the preferably flow he points peculiarly to the apsidal houses and the engraved pottery at the Altis place at Olympia, which Rutter (A Pigeonholing of Distinctive Pattern-Decorated Early Helladic III Pottery from Lerna and Its Implications, Hesperia 51 [1982] 45988) has identified as belonging to the former EH III.

Ryholt (The Political Situation in Egypt During the Second In-between Flow, c. 18001550 B.C. [Copenhagen 1997] 1045) has offered a unalike scene on the palace.

Smith (My Thought, in F. Thomas, ed. A Series of Arguments [New York 1999]) offers a unalike spot.